Many have traditionally held it as the standard career path to take a law degree, train in a firm, and qualify as a solicitor or barrister. But lately, legal apprenticeships have become popular as an experiential alternative to the lecture halls of law school.
So, which path is right for you? That would largely depend on one’s motivations towards career, finances, and even one’s preference in working environment. In this blog post, we explain some of the differences between law school experience and legal apprenticeships, aiding in your decision as to which course better aligns with your individual journey.
Law schools basically mean completing an undergraduate law degree (LLB) or conversion course and then professional training such as the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) for solicitors and the Bar Training Course (BTC) for barristers.
Academic Rigor: The law degree imparts deep knowledge of legal theories, case law, and principle.
Prestige and Tradition: Law school remains the most recognised and respected route, especially for those aspiring to job in top firms or chambers.
Career Flexibility: With a degree in law, one can also work outside of pure legal practice, for example, in government, teaching, or business.
The Networking: Colleges often have close relations with partner firms, who allow access to career fairs, placements, and mentoring.
Blocking Factors: The fees will run into tens of thousands of pounds, thus leaving many graduates in pretty bad debts.
Time Commitment: It takes 5-7 years to be qualified, combining attending law school and training.
Competition: There are many law graduates but far fewer training contracts, so it is highly competitive.
Legal apprenticeships let you work in a law firm and study during the evenings, weeknights, or weekends, in most cases on-the-job training paid for by the employer. Apprenticeships in the UK can last 5-6 years and may qualify you directly as a solicitor without the need ever to attend law school full-time.
Earn While You Learn: This means you are rewarded for your efforts by not having to bear the high cost of law school in way of debt.
Practical Experience: Skills are imparted from day one by dealing with client issues, solicitors, and cases.
Building Skills Under Your Employer’s Auspices: Keep in mind the usual practice of law firms,” pay for the exams and whatever study expenses you require,” at least to relieve a bit of financial pressure on your potential apprentice.
Early Total Immersion in Legal Culture: Apprenticeships expose people to how law firms run-the kind of knowledge that can set you apart from others in the workplace.
Lack of Academic Orientation: The focus is practical skills training rather than theory; hence, outside legal practice, the career options could remain restricted.
Time Pressure: It is hard balancing work and study; therefore, discipline and excellent time management skills are required.
Disparity in Prestige: Traditionalists still consider law school to be the “gold standard,” though this stigma is slowly dying down with the rising popularity of apprenticeships.
Lack of Networking: Constructing peer networks might become harder without a university environment.
When weighing law school vs. legal apprenticeship, ask yourself:
Both law school and legal apprenticeships represent valid, respectable paths to the profession. It is up to you to decide what is best for you, through the prism of your circumstances and goals.
At Owen Reed, we believe that a university law curriculum, combined with law schools or industry apprenticeships in the fields of law, is a viable path to creating talented legal professionals. What matters is how you leverage your skills, your network, and the opportunities that present themselves to you after choosing your path.
Applying for your next step in the legal profession? Owen Reed might pull through and help direct you toward opportunities that meet your career objectives.
Copyright 2022 © Owen Reed Ltd.
